The Venture 17 Division Of Education
Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again

THE CONSERVATORY OF MEDICAL ARTS AND SCIENCES
XVII
THE SEARCHLIGHT MESSENGER
THE SEARCHLIGHT MESSENGER
Blog
LEUKEMIA, THE PARADIGM MIRACLE
Posted on May 20, 2017 at 7:25 PM |
![]() |
MIGRAINES IN CHILDREN
Posted on May 20, 2017 at 7:23 PM |
![]() |
Many of you have read my article on
migraines entitled Is
My Headache a Migraine. Recently I have been approached with questions
from my college campus students regarding their children and the brittle
headaches their kids endure. Two students in particular stated that their child’s
doctor had diagnosed them as having migraines, prescribed the medicine, periactin as needed, but did not explain to them what
migraines in children are really all about. This is a little disturbing to me, as I feel the more educated my patients are, the better they are able to manage their headaches and lead normal healthy lives. This falls on the treating doctor, and unfortunately, it seems this new era of doctors is in such a hurry, it has forgotten how to teach. Osler would role in his grave! This part of treatment is obviously more important than the "periactin". And both should be part of an overall plan. "Written down and easy to follow", by both the parents and the little one. So, I thought this would be a good
time to again discuss this very debilitating disorder. No one ever wants to see a child suffer through these. I recommend reviewing the
above article in addition to this one. When you think about someone having
a headache, you probably think of an adult. But many kids have headaches too,
and for many of the very same reasons that adults have them. Children and teens can experience
muscle tension or migraine headaches. Among school age children ages 5 to 17 in the
United States, 20% are prone to headaches. Approximately 15% of these kids
experience muscle tension headaches and 5% are dealing with migraines. Chronic or frequent headaches can be
tough to handle, and are even harder to understand when you are young, especially
if you do not know anyone else who has them. By the time they reach high school,
most young people have experienced some type of headache. Fortunately, less
than 5% of headaches are the result of serious disease, such as a tumor,
abscess, infectious disease, or head trauma. Most headaches are muscle tension type, the
result of good and bad stress, sleep issues, or in a few instances,
environmental or food triggers. About 5% of recurrent headaches will be diagnosed
as migraine. Episodic headaches are those that
occur a few times a month at most. Chronic headaches occur with much more
frequency, even several times in a week. If a child who has only had an
occasional headache (once or twice a month) starts experiencing them more
frequently (two, or three times a week), then these should be considered
chronic and medical attention should be sought as soon as possible. One of the most frustrating aspects
of chronic headaches is the stress factor. Avoiding a known trigger is usually
easier than avoiding stress. Young people want to do well on tests and in
school, and they want to attend important events, but anticipating a math quiz
or musical recital, or eagerly looking forward to a party or being in the
school play, can result in anxiety or excitement. And, for some kids, this
leads to a headache. Up to 4% of children have their
first headache before they reach elementary school, and they may not yet know
how to describe the pain. If a young child has been crying or not eating, or
has been restless or irritable, consult with your doctor about finding the
source of discomfort or pain. Remember, the child has no idea what is happening and this can be very frightening. The more knowledge (and easy to understand guide lines) school health officials, as well as parents have about children and chronic migraines, such as common
triggers, symptoms, prevention, and treatments, the easier it will be to
identify the child who is suffering through these headaches. The best evidence based approach to treatment, interestingly, is the more holistic approach to little patients. It entails two things: 'chronic therapy', which addresses decreasing the frequency and intensity of the headaches, and 'acute therapy', which gives the patient and parents weapons to stave off an evolving attack. About 15% of kids experience a migraine
headache with an Aura. A typical aura is seeing colored or flashing lights,
blind spots, or wavy lines or feeling a tingling in the face or an arm or leg.
An aura alerts a migraine sufferer to the onset of a headache, warning the
child several minutes before the pain starts. A small percentage of migraine
sufferers also encounter temporary motor weakness, as they may lose their sense
of coordination, stumble, or have trouble expressing themselves. What causes a migraine? This is
treated at length in my original
article. For most kids, migraine is inherited from a parent. Migraine
occurs because of alterations in a person’s genetic makeup. An
individual migraine attack is often triggered by a particular environmental or
emotional event. In some cases, triggers can be identified. Among the most
commonly recognized ones are stress (good or bad), a change in routine, a change in sleep
pattern, bright lights or loud noises, or certain foods and beverages. Let’s
look at these for moment. One of the things I first have
patients, especially children do regarding brittle migraines, is keep a diary
of foods, sleep patterns, and other possible triggers. The best way to do this
is to get the whole family involved, and
use a big wall calender with plenty of space for everyone to write down what
they observe, as one person may notice something another didn't. There are many triggers in childhood
migraines that should be weeded out. Foods are huge, but other things as
mentioned above, like stress level, even positive stressors like more money,
new teacher, family gatherings, etc. can be big. Sleep can be a major player. I can't stress enough, the value of regular sleep
patterns and at least 9 hours of sleep every day for kids. Food is probably the biggest player, so you have to read labels closely. Here
are the biggest triggers I've seen in practice:
(1), Caffeine in any form, even in medicines. Keep in mind that caffeine is
also used to treat headaches, but can be a two edged sword, and, induce “rebound
phenomena”. (2), Mint, it's in everything, start tossing it out. (3), Red food
dyes. (4), Yellow food dyes. (5), Hard aged cheeses, like Parmesan, and
cheddars, remember also, that cheeses are not naturally yellow ( they have
yellow dye in them). (6), Pizza. (7), Lunch meats. (8), Hot dogs and sausages. (9),
Bacon, use "fresh-side", or "sugar cured". The above meats have nitrates in them which
induce migraines.
(13), The additive, Mono-Sodium Glutamate (MSG) is a monster and must be avoided, it is in
everything from snack foods, frozen foods, bullion, and ramen, to canned soups. (14), All citrus products. And watch out for sugar binges. Remember to write down every little detail that appears significant on that calendar,
and let your doctor know how it's going. After a formal diagnosis, a doctor's
goal is to help reduce or eliminate the symptoms of a migraine and prevent
future attacks. In regard
to treatment, sometimes children, especially young
children, do not need any medication to treat a headache. Often there are
non-medicinal treatments that can provide primary, or added benefit. During a migraine attack, a child
should be allowed to rest, and even sleep, in a quiet, dark and cool room.
Raising the child’s head up on a pillow and providing a cool compress for the
eyes or forehead can help them feel more comfortable. When at school, a child should
be allowed to go to the nurse’s office and rest. Sometimes a quick nap is all
it takes and they can return to the rest of the school day. Trigger avoidance and a regular
schedule are huge preventive measures that can be taken to avoid the frequency of
attacks. Relaxation and stress management
techniques can be helpful during an attack and to help alleviate stress before
it becomes a full blown an attack. Daily physical activity is also very
important in headache management and stress reduction. Two methods that have
been well documented to help children with migraine include meditation and
biofeedback. There is also much research that suggests hyper-hydration with plain water may
prevent frequency in migraine attack. Once a migraine has begun, several
types of medication can alleviate the symptoms. Analgesics, such as acetaminophen or
ibuprofen, are first-line pain relievers for treatment of headaches in children
and adolescents. The Triptans can be helpful in those children who don’t find
simple analgesics helpful. There are several different triptans available and
two (almotriptan [Axert®] and rizatriptan [Maxalt®]) are FDA-approved for
children. In addition, your doctor may also prescribe anti-emetics to stop the
nausea and vomiting or a sedative to help a child rest. Aspirin is not generally recommended
for kids, as there is now, well documented evidence linking aspirin to the development of
Reye's Syndrome, a rare disorder that children and teenagers can get while they
are recovering from childhood infections, such as chicken pox, flu, and other
viral infections. Reye's symptoms include nausea, severe vomiting, fever,
lethargy, stupor, restlessness, and even delirium. Children and adolescents who
experience migraine attacks more than twice a week and which interfere with
school or social activities, may be prescribed a daily medicine to try to
prevent headaches. There are no medications that have been specifically
designed for migraine so they all come from other categories including
anti-seizure, blood pressure and anti-depressant drug classes. Common
preventive medicines include beta blockers, tricyclic antidepressants,
topiramate, and valproate. Please note: none of these medications are approved
for migraine treatment in children. However, research in this area continues
with excellent progress and doctors will utilize these medications as "off label" prescriptions. Frequent headaches, especially those
that occur more than once a week, deserve treatment, with both medication and
non-medicinal options. Headaches are not good for the brain and
headaches often lead to more headaches. With the right treatment regimen your
child can get his or her headaches under control and prevent further
progression. Further questions can be directed
below, and look for continued articles on headaches in future posts on The Searchlight Messenger. |
My Advice to Medical Students
Posted on March 22, 2016 at 2:54 PM |
![]() |
Managing Headache: Too Many Tests, Not Enough Counseling?
Posted on April 20, 2015 at 2:25 PM |
![]() |
The high prevalence of headache is
associated with substantial societal costs. There are approximately 12 million
clinician office visits for headache per year in the United States, and
headaches are estimated to cost the US economy $31 billion per year. The
evaluation of headache accounts for some of this financial cost, but it can also
have severe medical consequences. One study estimated that 4000 additional
cancers were promoted by the 18 million computed tomography (CT) scans of the
head performed in the United States in 2007. Another study found that the
majority of all CT imaging of the head and brain were inappropriate, based on
current recommendations. Most inappropriate CT imaging was ordered for
headache. The inappropriate use of resources in
the management of headache has led to recommendations to reduce the use of
brain imaging and physician referral, as well as limited use of opioids and
barbiturates in the treatment of headache. But are clinicians following these
recommendations? The current study by Mafi and colleagues explores this issue. Study
Synopsis and Perspective Contrary to practice guidelines,
clinicians treating patients with headache are increasingly ordering costly
imaging tests and referring patients to other physicians, and they are doing
less counseling on lifestyle changes, authors of a new review suggest. The researchers found an almost
doubling of the use of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a recent
10-year period. Although given the nature of the study
they could not determine which referrals or imaging studies were not
appropriate, the trend toward a doubling of these tests is concerning, said
lead study author John N. Mafi, MD, fellow, general internal medicine, Beth
Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. "We have no reason to suspect that
headache is a disease that epidemiologically or pathophysiologically has
changed over the past decade, so this, we think, is inappropriate changes in
physician practice patterns." The study was published online January 8 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. Inappropriate
Changes? Researchers used data from the National
Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory
Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2010. Both
surveys obtain nationally representative samples of ambulatory patient visits
across the United States. From these surveys, researchers
identified ambulatory visits (excluding emergency department visits) with a
chief complaint and/or a primary diagnosis of headache. They also included
those with secondary complaints and diagnoses of headache but unrelated primary
reasons for the visit (eg, hyperlipidemias). In the group of patient visits with a
chief complaint of headache (80.8%), the surveys provide duration or context of
symptoms in 5 categories: new onset (<3 months), acute-on-chronic flare-up,
chronic routine, routine/preventive, and preoperative or postoperative visit. Researchers studied 4 types of
measures: use of advanced imaging, including CT and MRI; referrals to other
physicians; counseling on diet, nutrition, exercise, mental health, and stress
management; and use of medications. The analysis included 9362 visits
related to headache, which represented approximately 144 million visits during
the study period. Almost 75% of the patients were women, and their mean age
remained the same during the study, at approximately 46 years. The study showed that advanced imaging,
including CT or MRI, increased from 6.7% of visits in 1999-2000 to 13.9% in
2009-2010 (P < .001), as did referrals to other physicians, which
rose from 6.9% to 13.2% (P = .005). Although rare, there are "real
concerns" about kidney injury due to use of contrast dye and radiation
during imaging tests, commented Dr Mafi. The study showed that during the same
study period, counseling for headache prevention declined from 23.5% to 18.5% (P
= .041). But there were also somewhat
encouraging results. For example, use of opioids and barbiturates, which are
not recommended for headache, remained the same at approximately 18%. "That's still quite a high number
for a discouraged medication, so there's lots of room for improvement,"
commented Dr. Mafi. Also, preventive medication for
migraine, such as verapamil, amitriptyline, propranolol, and topiramate, nearly
doubled — from 8.5% to 15.9% (P = .001). Abortive therapies, such as
triptans and ergot alkaloids, rose from 9.8% to 15.4% (P = .022). Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs and acetaminophen remained stable at roughly 16%. The trends remained after adjustment
for age, gender, race, geographic region, insurance status, symptom duration,
urban location, and whether the physician was identified as the primary care
practitioner. As well, there were similar trends between visits related to
migraine vs nonmigraine headache, although patients with migraine received
triptans/ergot alkaloids and preventive therapies more often, and their use of
opioid or barbiturates was higher. Use of CT/MRI rose more rapidly for
those with nonmigraine headache, as did referrals to other physicians. Acute vs Chronic As for acute vs chronic headache, again
the trends were similar. Use of CT/MRI appeared to rise more rapidly among
patients with acute symptoms, although this difference did not achieve
significance. In addition, patients with chronic
headache had lower adjusted odds of receiving referrals to other physicians
(odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 - 0.82) or
undergoing advanced imaging (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.35 - 0.63) compared with other
presentations. However, there were no significant differences across time as
trends in referrals and imaging still nearly doubled for both groups. Numerous factors are driving these
trends, including a growing number of assertive and demanding patients, the
authors suggest. "They come in and say 'I need an MRI for my headache' as
opposed to 'I have a headache'," said Dr Mafi, adding that MRI and CT are
more available now than ever before. As well, physicians have an incentive to
make patients happy because they are increasingly being rated on satisfaction
surveys, said Dr Mafi. There are also financial incentives for
physicians to do more testing and concerns about legal liability if tests are
not ordered. Time constraints are another
contributing factor. "There is simply not enough time during the visit to
counsel" patients on making lifestyle modifications to help treat their
headache, said Dr Mafi. Reversing the trends will require a
change in approach to reimbursement that relies less on the physical clinician
visit and more on new technologies, said Dr Mafi. "Rather than lengthen the visit or
pay doctors more, I think we need to move away from that 20th-century mindset
and really think about reimbursing care across a continuum of time," he
said. "We need to think about reimbursing high-quality care at any time,
whether it's electronic or through a secure email message between the patient
and physician, or an electronic visit or telemedicine visit where patients can
contribute to their records online and have the doctor provide feedback." Appropriateness
Unclear For a comment, Medscape Medical News
reached out to Elizabeth Loder, MD, chief, Division of Headache and Pain,
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and immediate past
president, American Headache Society (AHS), who headed the AHS "Choosing
Wisely" project that looked at opioid prescribing. The new study was well done, has
"some fascinating findings," and is important in light of the fact
that headache treatment and management trends are a neglected medical problem,
said Dr Loder. However, she raised several issues
about interpretation. For one thing, she pointed out that the NAMCS and NHAMCS
do not provide information that would help determine whether imaging studies
were appropriately or inappropriately ordered. "In clinical practice, we see both
underuse and overuse of imaging studies. Patients with complex, refractory
chronic headache problems frequently have multiple — usually unnecessary —
imaging studies. In contrast, it remains common for us to see in a headache
clinic patients with worrisome presentations of headache who have not been
imaged." The data suggest that much of the
increase in imaging may be due to an increase in acute as opposed to chronic
headache, said Dr Loder. "This is exactly the situation where imaging
is most likely to be appropriate." As well, the results show that imaging
is more common in patients with nonmigraine headache rather than migraine
headache. "Again, this is a situation where imaging may well be
appropriate." Dr Loder stressed that when the AHS
formulated its "Choosing Wisely" recommendations, the committee felt
that evidence to discourage imaging was strong only for patients with stable
headache who met criteria for migraine. According to the recommendations,
imaging in patients without migraine is not necessarily inappropriate. "The proportion of scan
abnormalities is higher in patients with nonmigraine headaches and we did not
feel evidence was sufficient to discourage imaging in those cases." Dr Loder also noted that the increase
in imaging and referrals has occurred alongside an "enormous downward
pressure" on the time physicians can devote to patient concerns during an
office visit. Physicians have to spend more time on paperwork, electronic
medical record "meaningful use" requirements, and other things, she
said. "Ordering tests and making
referrals are both relatively quick ways to demonstrate concern for a patient's
symptoms and maintain patient satisfaction." She pointed out that although some
guidelines or recommendations encourage physicians to counsel about diet,
nutrition, and lifestyle, these are based only on expert opinion. "The
evidence that this type of counseling actually improves patient outcomes is
thin to nonexistent." She also noted that the "Choosing
Wisely" recommendations were developed on the basis of processes that are
less rigorous and detailed than those used to create actual guidelines (eg,
those developed by the American College of Physicians in 2000), and the two
probably should not be confused. Low Value "'Choosing Wisely' recommendations
are intended to identify practices that often — although not always — represent
low-value care and that patients and physicians should discuss and
question," said Dr Loder. "That is not the same thing as saying they
are always inappropriate." According to these recommendations,
situations exist where the use of opioids and barbiturates may be appropriate,
although they should not be first-line treatments in most situations, said Dr
Loder. Similarly, the recommendations encourage the use of advanced imaging
with MRI rather than CT in nonemergent headache for which imaging was thought
to be appropriate. "I think the authors are
overstating the case for limiting imaging studies when they say that there is
'broad agreement' on these issues and characterize these things as 'low-value
services.' They are not inherently low value — they are low value only in
specific contexts." Dr Loder found it "very
interesting" that among those presenting with headache, women were
significantly less likely than men to have imaging studies. Dr Mafi and Dr Loder
have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr Loder is acting director
of research at the BMJ but noted that
although she is paid for that work, her comments do not necessarily reflect the
views of the BMJ, the AHS, or Brigham and Women's Hospital. J Gen Intern Med. Published online January 8, 2015. Abstract Study
Highlights
Clinical
Implications
|
Slow Cooker Posole
Posted on March 1, 2015 at 1:30 PM |
![]() |
How to Paint a Water Drop
Posted on May 9, 2014 at 4:41 PM |
![]() |
The Teaching Philosophy of Dr. Counce, Professor of Medicine
Posted on July 10, 2012 at 12:34 AM |
![]() |
Categories
- Arts and Photography (8)
- Video Education (1)
- Medical Law (6)
- Psychology (2)
- Personal Fitness (2)
- Business (5)
- Social Comment (17)
- Political Comment (3)
- Clinical Update (15)
- Special Post (8)
- Education and Political Action (4)
- Student Post (5)
- Recipes (4)
- Science Update (4)
- Medical Opinion (8)
- Medical History (8)
- Education (8)
- Medical Advise (8)
/